Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOOCs Framework


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

MOOCs Framework

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Content fork from Massive open online course it may be appropriate to move some content to that article, although see discussions there/on that talk page regarding the history of moocs. This article has no references and may fail WP:NOR. The notability of some sources may be problematic, although again others might usefully be incorporated into the mooc article, ideally with content and inline citation rather than as further reading. Moot (but possibly useful) aside but for future reference the page name should also be 'Massive open online course framework' Sjgknight (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I have removed the prose of the article, as it seems a copyvio; see the discussion on the talk page. If the prose is in fact under a compatible license (I could not find one), please revert and apologies for the mistaken deletion. --Mark viking (talk) 21:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete the article has been sitting almost empty for a week now, I thought it met the criteria for speedy deletion before but that tag was reverted by the article creator who has made no further edits or comments on this discussion. There may be productive ways to incorporate the content into the main MOOC page but this should bear in mind the tags above, and the discussion on the MOOC page around problems with that article. Sjgknight (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete with the copyvio content removed, there is only an external links section left. No prejudice to recreation if a motivated author can find multiple reliable sources and can write proper summaries. But right now, an empty article suggests blowing it up per WP:TNT and starting over. --Mark viking (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.