Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOREP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo 10:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

MOREP

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lebanese political movement. Written by Morepist so clearly there is COI. No independent refs. Is it notable? -- RHaworth 09:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Please review the independent references in MOREP article including Lebanese newspapers. It is written for a purpose to define MOREP since it is well known movement in the Lebanon. Many articles could be suspected of COI but still has public interest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.101.156.197 (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral/Weak Keep More an NPOV issue than a lack of notability. Maybe pull out offending terms and label for an EXPERT. Mbisanz 02:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mbisanz, although I'd guess labelling it for an expert is just going to attract every Joe and his uncle to come out and declare themselves, as members of the movement, experts. I say tag it for npov and keep. --( L' Aquatique : Bringing chaos & general mayhem to the Wiki for One Year!) 06:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Citi Cat   ♫  04:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletions.   —User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 10:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it is a genuine organisation, as its mentions in Robert Fisks latest book. Article needs lots of work. scope_creep 16:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep More developments added to this article for review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morepist (talk • contribs) 20:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.