Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MPLS Myths


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 03:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

MPLS Myths
This isn't an article but an essay, a polemic arguing a particular POV about a data protocol. It's way out on neutrality and tone, and skates on the edge of original research ("'Because of the marketing push there are many popular untruths about MPLS, this paper is here to show some of them"). Despite tagging since December 8th 2005, no-one has seemed inclined to mend it, so maybe deletion is more appropriate Tearlach 20:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete is more appropriate. Madman 20:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge carefully There is some info on that page which looks like it might be worth merging into MPLS, but I think an expert should do it. The rest should just be deleted as a POV fork. --Bachrach44 21:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 21:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV fork and pretty poor at that. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 21:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Stifle 01:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Terence Ong Talk 11:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.