Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MR GASPAR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, call it WP:SNOW or WP:CSD, a difference which makes no difference. Guy (Help!) 16:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

MR GASPAR

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability; unreferenced. Just another 18-year-old aspiring to notability, but not quite there yet. Biruitorul (talk) 03:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Biggest "notability" is the endorsement of an unauthorized remix by ... a redlink. MySpace-level backscratching does not notability make. --Dhartung | Talk 03:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable vanity entry, we are flooded with these. Doc   Tropics  05:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for failure to meet any criterion under WP:MUSIC.  Anturiaethwr  Talk  06:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails the WP:MUSIC notability criteria as it hasn't had significant press coverage as far as I know (checked google news), no big hits etc. Atyndall93  |  talk  06:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not MySpace. [Update: I now see the analogy was already made, but I'm sticking to my one-liner.] Dahn (talk) 06:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 08:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Signed to a record label without even a single reference on google takes "indie label" to a new low, as it were. Non-notable as heck. Wikipedia will include people like this when Intel comes out with "that new 150 petabyte hard drive" for our servers. Ironholds (talk) 17:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.