Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSN Messneger , Previous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete --Durin 12:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

MSN Messneger, Previous
There is already an article pertaining to MSN Messenger at MSN Messenger. This article is not useful in any way, and serves no purpose. I nominated it for speedy deletion, but its author objected. Martin 17:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - pointless, and its title is misspelt. SergeantBolt (t,c) 17:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per SergeantBolt and complete redundancy with MSN Messenger.-- Hús  ö  nd  18:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * There is NOT an article pertaining to msn messenger, just WLM (Windows Live).
 * Ther is an article on its history though. But thatz not the point. I posted the narticlefor users who use systems that cannot run WLM, and if this is put back correctly, I will have a link to a site where people using slow or junky computers can find out more about the product that actually works for them, not one that doesn't. Besides, all the products are splitting;soon you might be arguing with someone who wants to write an article about Hotmail not Windows Live Mail.


 * --I saw the article and liked it so i wish you would leave it alone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sam798 (talk • contribs).


 * User:Sam798 wrote the entirety of the above, and I propose he/she is a sock puppet of User:Ethan.hardman. Martin 18:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * This page has been moved by the author copying the contents into a new article. Accordingly, the new article is up for deletion here. Martin 18:48, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant. Resolute 05:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.