Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MS Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

MS Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article for non-notable organization, fails WP:NORG. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 06:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 06:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 06:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 06:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - MS Australia is the peak body for multiple sclerosis advocacy and research in Australia. They feature regularly in television news broadcasts and print newspapers, not to mention online  where their representatives are cited as technical experts and advocates. Arguably, some of their events like the MS Read-athon  and the May 50k are notable in their own right. The view held by MS Australia with regard to Government policy is considered significant enough that MS Australia's CEO is the most prominent person cited in a number of technical and editorial articles , including in relation to international research . Even second and third-level MS Australia functionaries (like individual program coordinators) are cited because they represent MS Australia . I accept that WP:BEFORE is challenging here because searching for "MS Australia" gets so many seemingly unrelated hits... but I would suggest most of them are actually related and loop back to MS Australia; coverage is simply that voluminous.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep It needs to be more encyclopedic in style and tone, BUT the organisation is notable.   There is more than sufficient referencing in independent publications with editorial supervision to establish notability.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per Stalwart111 and Aoziwe, and per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Deus et lex (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.