Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSpy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus to keep following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 12:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

MSpy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Software article of questionable notability, previously deleted in this 2013 afd, recreated by now-blocked SPA as possibly promotional. This listing is a replacement for an incomplete listing by another editor from earlier in Nov. 2015 Dialectric (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 20:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Where's the advertising? This article actually cites some pretty bad reception, which I would say also establishes its notability. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 12:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep simply because of the listed reception which suggests significance and notability. Notifying past AfD commenters and  in case they come around for commenting.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with the others, the negative sources make it somewhat notable. However that "Software" section is definitely written like an ad and should be revised. FrameDrag (talk) 13:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The spamminess that concerned me before seems to be mostly absent in this version, and there is some actual coverage of the software in 3rd party sources now.  AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 13:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.