Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTR Light Rail Route 705/706


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Jc86035 (talk &#124; contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 06:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

MTR Light Rail Route 705/706
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Could easily be summarised in one or two paragraphs in Light Rail (Hong Kong) § Stops and routes. Article has been unsourced since its creation; I could not find any reliable sources on either Google or DuckDuckGo except for short news briefs on minor traffic accidents. Jc86035 (talk &#124; contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 14:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong KEEP. The article was nominated for deletion just over 60 days ago by the same editor (with the result “keep”) and nothing has changed since, so I don't see what the point of this new deletion request is. Useddenim (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The only comment or vote related to the two route articles was yours (where you voted to merge this article into Light Rail (Hong Kong)). The others did not mention them, and only mentioned the stop articles. Jc86035 (talk &#124; contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 04:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That merge suggestion was in the context of your desire for a mass deletion of all of the Hong Kong Light Rail stop articles. Besides, it would be pointless to have kept all of those, and now delete the article for the route(s) that link them all together. As says at WP:Articles for deletion/MTR Light Rail Route 505, it’s time to move on. Useddenim (talk) 12:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Besides being an entire rail route, this was AfD closed as "keep" less than 60 days ago. Just because most didn't "mention" this article only confirms that in the entire discussion there was no consensus to delete it. --Oakshade (talk) 15:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.