Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTV Gimme 10


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to MTV Philippines.  MBisanz  talk 02:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

MTV Gimme 10

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a non-notable chart apparently compiled from text votes rather than record sales or airplay. WP:CHARTS regards such charts as generally bad. The article is sourced from non-RS sources, has little information about the chart itself and most of the article is just chart data. I did suggest merging this article to MTV Philippines but there has been no interest at all in doing this (either for or against). This would seem to suggest that even the people interested in MTV Philippines do not care about it. It certainly is not notable enough to survive as an article in its own right so I favour deleting it and/or redirecting it to MTV Philippines. DanielRigal (talk) 00:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to MTV Philippines; insufficiently notable on its own. JJL (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The WP:BADCHARTS list shows that charts formed by viewer feedback via texts and phone calls usually aren't allowed, and this seems to meet that standard.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable chart. May qualify as WP:BADCHARTS. JamesBurns (talk) 09:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: If this is a TV program, I think this can be kept or merge with MTV Philippines. – Howard  the   Duck  16:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: That is why I initially suggested a merge. It seemed that nobody was interested. I don't think we need a full merge with all of the chart data (which is not sourced from RS) but I have no objection to the introduction (which is only a single sentence anyway) being merged. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  —Bluemask (talk) 04:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.