Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYC4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Subject of a full-length article in the Times; that's enough to warrant a stub. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D  04:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

MYC4
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP and WP:SPAM. Riddled with self links and press releases with trivial coverage or mentions. Was speedied twice previously once under WP:CSD Spam advertising, and once as WP:CSD as spam-article MyC4 (now a redirect). Self-promotion and product placement are WP:NOT the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Keep. Sources: There is plenty of sources out there qulifying reliable, independent secondary sources —. Perhaps, the article is riddled with self links and press releases with trivial coverage or mentions — Be Bold! Expand the article, this is a stub. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 19:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * PS: What do you mean by self-promotion and product placement? Have you checked my edit counts? I wrote most of this article and I do not work for MYC4. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 19:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 19:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Unless substantial improvements are made to the article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep --Armando82 (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:NOREASON. The debate is not a vote. Not valid grounds for inclusion.--Hu12 (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 01:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.