Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYXX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 11:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

MYXX

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

These girls are a sight for sore eyes but the group as a whole doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO. I can't verify anything listed in the article, their debut album doesn't even appear to be in production, and the article's link to their official website is dead. In addition, Google only comes up with MySpace links and other blogs, and the official website of their record label barely mentions them. Erpert (let's talk about it) 23:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Delete - Not finding sources for notability. Deadlink of official site is not a good sign. - Stillwaterising (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

There are numerous things that I did not add myself, fans added them instead so I have been trying to delete some of the subheadings of the article. Their record label does mention them just as much as they mention their other 3 recording artists and also have one of Myxx's songs on their playlist, their song that is on the playlist is called 'Headache'.(Laydee Lyca 21:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laydee Lyca (talk • contribs)

If you want to delete the MYXX article, that's absolutely fine with me because I think they need to release their debut album before a wiki article should be written about them. With this being said, they are nice girls so they don't deserve for you to say their a sight for sore eyes, if you don't like them that's fine but I'd rather you keep it to yourself or at least keep it strictly professional and just get the article deleted. (Laydee Lyca 21:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laydee Lyca (talk • contribs)
 * Um...saying someone is "a sight for sore eyes" is a compliment. Erpert (let's talk about it) 21:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

oh ok, well if the article must be deleted, I'm fine with it because there's just no point of having the article there if they don't meet the criteria, I'll just make a wiki article for them once their debut album comes out because that will be more appropriate. (Laydee Lyca 11:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laydee Lyca (talk • contribs)


 * Delete - Coverage in reliable sources are lacking. Perhaps when they've actually released an album things might change. -- Whpq (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I think it would be better once they release their album because right now there's not much to right about them.(Laydee Lyca 20:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laydee Lyca (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.