Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYX Hit Chart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 21:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

MYX Hit Chart

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable chart, not covered in any reliable sources, dubious methodology. Hosted by myx which is notable, but notability is by no means inherited. Doesn't seem worth merging as it's almost entirely unverifiable. Regardless of outcome, should be added to WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm going to split my vote:
 * Keep MYX Hit Chart and Pinoy MYX Countdown. While the charts use a bogus methodology that keeps them from being useful, the same is true for TRL and a pile of other similar shows. MYX isn't a major network, but it has a high-enough profile that the basic charts are worth documenting.
 * Delete the rest: because SMS messaging isn't a legitimate basis for charts, documenting which songs happened to receive more votes than another isn't necessary.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your keep argument is basically WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It still needs sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I had my doubts about this stuff for a while but I wasn't sure whether this was something with a big local following so I only tagged some of them. My view is that any chart which is not based on sales is on very dubious territory. Such non-sales charts exist in their thousands and nobody takes much notice of them. According to Record charts, I see that some airplay charts are also considered acceptable. Even so, these charts are based on things like text messages. That is clearly no good. Unless there is RS coverage, these should all be deleted. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all: non-notable unreliable charts. JamesBurns (talk) 05:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.