Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M & M Coaches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge, even though the participants were not entirely clear about where to merge it. As an editor, I am merging and redirecting to the town the company serves, Accrington. Not all the content will be merged however; the stuff about Mercedes minibuses seems a bit irrelevant for a geographical article. Page history will remain online. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

M & M Coaches
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. This article is about a company which fails WP:N and WP:ORG as it hasn't been the subject of discussion in multiple, reliable sources and it has not signifantly impacted its industry  Them From  Space  00:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only one gnews hit (from which I found its incorporation date & added to article). Went through all 97 google hits none of which contained anything notable. J04n(talk page) 11:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * M&M Coaches based in Kidderminster was a different company (and dissolved in 2005). M&M Coaches based in Accrington is a trading name but does not appear to be a registered company. snigbrook (talk) 14:44, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment. I'd say the fact that a bus company provides a number of bus routes within a local area is notable, just not necessarily as an entire article (and I certainly can't see anything notable about the rest of it). I'd normally suggest merging this into a more encompassing article, but I can't think of any obvious destination. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge somewhere. The company does not derve an article of its own.  If kept it should be under the company name, not its trade name, though the trading name should survive as a redirect.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:00, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to somewhere. I'm not 100% sure where it could go. All I can say for sure is that it shouldn't have its own article. 7OA That's a letter in the middle, folks. 22:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep SEE MY GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:GHITS? Please show some of the examples of the reliable sources that point to notability in that search. NW ( Talk ) 23:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge if someone comes up with where to merge it to, it has some gbooks coverage that may establish notability UltraMagnusspeak 10:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.