Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M Abdurahman Salafi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as the particular best thing here is the fact he's a Vice Chancellor of a university that is notable thus he is notable for an article (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  07:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

M Abdurahman Salafi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notext, Notability - Arts  Rescuer  •  Talk me  10:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC) — ArtsRescuer (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Shafinusri (talk • contribs).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Very notable Islamic scholar, but article needs better sourcing and rewrite, that I'll start working on. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Request Hi, and  Can you please advise as to what WP:Indian policies/guidlines/sourcing apply to this articles subject please? Also, there are to many foreign language sources for me to go through and would appreciate some guidance on that issue too. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * (Alternative search per WP:INDAFD: M Abdurahman Salafi) --Sam Sailor Talk! 14:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * In actually looking:
 * WP:INDAFD: M. Abdurahman Salafi Abdurahman Salafi
 * WP:INDAFD: M. Abdurahman Salafi Abdurahman Salafi
 * WP:INDAFD: M. Abdurahman Salafi Abdurahman Salafi


 * Keep per sources being available and an erroneous deletion rationale "Notext, Notability". The article HAS content and context enough to be a suitable stub which can be further improved over time and through even a little editorial attention. Serves the project to improve, not delete.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 14:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)k


 * Comment: I see that on  could wait no further, and tagged the article with A7. User:RHaworth speedy deleted the article a few hours later. Given the Keep opinions by  and  I have left a message on RHaworth's user talk page asking him to explain the deletion. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has been around for nearly four years and nobody has expanded it beyond a stub so he probably is not notable. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOEFFORT. North America1000 16:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 19:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per MQS's analysis, meets WP:GNG, not a valid rationale provided by nominator. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 20:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calicut. Obviously notable and meets WP:PROF. The VC is the professional head of a Commonwealth university. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.