Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M Hassan Mazandarani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

M Hassan Mazandarani

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC) M Hassan Mazandarani
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military,  and Iran. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment tbh this looks like a hoax to me. No fa.wiki article, no Farsi sources I can find, lots of improbable dates and a dodgy photo. Mccapra (talk) 19:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agreed, WP:BEFORE brings nada, zilch. Ditto News (name in title). Poorly constructed article. --Whiteguru (talk) 20:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - This was supposed to be the text of the AFD, and didn't get in, so here it is:

Neither this article nor Major Hassan Mazandarani, which has been proposed for deletion, is ready for article space as a biography of a living person. This article does not establish biographical notability, and does not have the footnotes that are required for a biography of a living person. The author appears to be spamming article space and draft space with multiple copies of this biography. This biography lacks a proper lede sentence, and so does not establish what the claim of significance is for the subject. There is also a draft at Draft:Hassan Mazandarani. The draft should be left alone for improvement, and this article should be deleted, as should the other version of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC, possible WP:HOAX. Mztourist (talk) 05:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per possible WP:HOAX. Even if it wasn't a hoax and this person indeed does exist, this article is poorly constructed anyway, with improper sourcing not even distributed throughout the article like they should be, instead clustered all the way at the bottom. Completely meaningless to me. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not even close to being notable. Bearian (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.