Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maíra Vieira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 19:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Maíra Vieira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about a person who may not meet notability guidelines. Linguist111 (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 15:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 15:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 15:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Hardly any news coverage Linguist111 (talk) 19:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete at best for questionable for WP:CREATIVE, at best we could also redirect this to the Brazil's Next Top Model Season 2 article. Nothing else convincing for her article though, SwisterTwister   talk  03:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources for the ptwiki article are mostly blogs or broken links. Two mentions on the reliable band.com.br were just that—mentioning her name. Not notable. giso6150 (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources.  The article notes: "Premio: Maira Vieira es la nueva Brazil’s Next Top Model y ganó un contrato por $200.000 con la agencia Ford de Nueva York" Google Translate of the text: "Prize: Maira Vieira is the new Brazil's Next Top Model and won a $ 200,000 contract with the Ford agency in New York"  </li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Maíra Vieira to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 23:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * That the subject received significant coverage in the Costan Rican newspaper La Nación (San José) in December 2008 and significant coverage in the Brazilian news organization Grupo Globo six months after she won Brazil's Next Top Model strongly establishes that she is notable. I agree with SwisterTwister that a second option is to redirect to Brazil's Next Top Model (cycle 2) (and preserve the article's history under the redirect), which is preferable to deletion. Cunard (talk) 23:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to allow time for review of new sources presented. North America1000 01:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete; clearly non-notable per WP:GNG. Only decent coverage I found consists of 2 articles, one from 2009 and one from 2011. She got her 15 minutes, now she's been forgotten. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not seeing significant coverage. No issue with a redirect to the Top Model article.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Based on sources presented by User:Cunard, subject's notability seems to exceed the celebrity which comes with high performance in a high profile television show. Even delete !voter User:FoCuSandLeArN is finding "decent coverage" in articles which postdate the TV show by years. Clearly passes WP:BASIC. As suggested above, if not kept I'd prefer redirection to deletion, for the reasons given by Cunard. BusterD (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 01:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Please do not misinterpret my comments, which were intended to demonstrate the inability of the subject to pass general notability. These two sources are poor, outdated, and do not constitute wide coverage deserving of representation in an encyclopaedia. NO coverage whatsoever besides those two articles should be great enough indication of this fact. Best, FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  23:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.