Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Małgorzata Tracz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Małgorzata Tracz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Małgorzata Tracz is co-leader on non-parliamentarian party, which contains about 500 members. She is not notable politician (as for today) to have an article in Wikipedia. Her biography was also in the Polish Wikipedia, where was just deleted. Kmicic (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Discussion page was created without afd2 template or listing in a daily log. Fixed now--no comment on the nomination itself. -- Finngall   talk  01:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep or simply redirect to party's article as I'm not familiar nor speaker of Polish politics but if this is not independently notable yet, moving to the group's article should suffice as well. SwisterTwister   talk  06:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist per Piotrus' suggestion.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete (but postpone decision until late October's elections). I see one regional source of some reliability, but as a politician, she and her party are pretty much a non-entity, and the sources are lacking. However, I'd suggest userfying rather than deleting, sooner or later she may be elected to the national parliament, and thus become notable. In fact, the elections are this weekend, so postponing the decision on this for a week or two may solve our problems (if she is elected, this should be kept immediately). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userify Seems like an article that popped up for political reasons. I can't read the sources, but seeing as other editors have said they are weak, I would agree that this article should be deleted. I also believe that the article should be deleted as soon as consensus is found. Octobers Polish elections should have no bearing on the validity of an article even if there is a chance for the party to be elected. If it needs to be recovered in the future due to that party being nominated, so be it. Jcmcc (Talk) 15:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 20:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Poland's Green Party was part of a larger United Left coalition for the election just concluded. This alliance won no seats.  -- Finngall   talk  22:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.