Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mabbly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Mabbly

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not sure if this one passes WP:NORG. The article is completely promotional and really says very little. Checking for secondary sources finds some fluff PR pieces.  Qcne  (talk)  18:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Qcne   (talk)  18:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Illinois. Skynxnex (talk) 19:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, as it seems promotional, especially in the second paragraph. 2NumForIce  (speak  &#124; edits) 23:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - self-promotional and not notable enough. I couldn't find any significant coverage. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see some references, but not independent ones. Suitskvarts (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.