Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mabel Fortune Driscoll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Mabel Fortune Driscoll

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet GNG; no significant coverage beyond being a Titanic passenger. –dlthewave ☎ 16:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. WCM email 10:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Passengers of the RMS Titanic: no need for more information about her than that. Pam  D  10:29, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. Parsecboy (talk) 13:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's and Parsecboy's rationales. --1l2l3k (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:Oneevent, no indication of any notability whatsoever apart from it; the implication that the person's sexual orientation might imply some notability is peculiarly unencyclopaedic. If the article is eventually kept, it will have to be completely rewritten from scratch as part of an open CCI. Assuming it is deleted, no objection to subsequent creation of a redirect to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The Titanic survivor aspect means sources SHOULD exist. Every survivor was covered in great detail after. Though the article as it stands is kind of.. meh. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.