Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacDermot Roe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

MacDermot Roe
I can't convince myself that this is actually notable, plus it seems to consist mainly of original research. Ben W Bell 12:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. Normally I would say Delete per WP:Notability and WP:NOR. But I sort of like this article (and the website). "Do not delete without a good reason" comes to mind. AvB &divide; talk  14:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Articles on clans and families can be notable; this one is just so, IMO. BrianSmithson 20:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable Irish clann.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  20:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep No apparent reason to delete this. D e nni &#9775;  00:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Notable and historically prominent Irish sept. Grutness...wha?  00:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable enough and looks a decent article. Rhion 09:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.