Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacPherson (Warehouse 13)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

MacPherson (Warehouse 13)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not finding evidence of this passing WP:GNG, source search not turning anything up in particular. The article also fails to indicate why the episode is especially noteworthy. ASUKITE 15:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Television,  and United States of America.  ASUKITE  15:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following recently-created episodes for the same reason:
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ASUKITE 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete all: This failed WP:GNG. Agreed with Asukite. CastJared (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Excellent. I’ll just stay in my lane and stop trying! Skukklenoggin (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't take it personally. We have fairly strong policies regarding notability for a reason, but we absolutely want your contributions! It's just a learning opportunity. God knows I've had a few of those myself. ASUKITE  17:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand! It is just difficult to do anything when there are no sources available to link to because the websites that published things at the time are long gone. I really appreciate all the effort you and so many others have gone to to suggest improvements or find sources, or even in so many cases; make a minor edit of removing an extra apostrophe rather than just clicking the “undo” button and erasing twenty minutes of piecework.
 * This page series only took what, about 16 hours? That’s ok. It’s just not notable enough. Skukklenoggin (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This is why it is recommended to work your way up to article creation. *sighs* Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 21:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete all with no bias against recreation if proper sourcing can be found. Onel 5969  TT me 22:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: all. Fancruft. Fails GNG.  // Timothy :: talk 
 * Comment: If anyone wants to look up individual episodes, there's always the show's Fandom wiki; otherwise, we here are already getting by with just the standard-affair List of Warehouse 13 episodes. (Echoing from almost 13 years ago: TV episodes are not notable enough for WP unless they receive a good deal of press coverage in various reliable sources.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.