Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacScoop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Apple community.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

MacScoop

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Url now directs to Silicon Rumors which has numerous Warning Cannot modify header information errors, the most recent article in its Active forum topic is dated 12-28-2008, and the text was a verbatim repeat (including the references) of what was in the Apple community page (ie it provide no additional information warranting a separate page). BruceGrubb (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Once notable, always notable. The New York Times reference to its sibling site, MacOSXRumors.com, is sufficient to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The issue is not that it wasn't notable but that the exact same information was already covered in the Apple community article ie there is no reason for THIS article to exist.--BruceGrubb (talk) 01:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 07:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, or rather redirect to the other article. IMO. David V Houston (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.