Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac OS X pricing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck 05:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Mac OS X pricing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Per Articles for deletion/IPhone availability, sales, and pricing, consensus seems to be that Wikipedia is WP:NOT a catalog. In addition, this article seems to state that it is entirely original research on the part of the author. If someone wants prices on Apple products, they should be visiting Apple's website, not Wikipedia. shoy (words words) 01:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This article is no different from Windows Vista editions and pricing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nja247 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Chris!  c t 01:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a sale catalog. Chris!  c t 01:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't PriceGrabber. Not maintainable. Carlossuarez46 01:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not encyclopedic at all, just some ephemeral pricing info. I mean, who's gonna read this a couple years down the road?   Turgidson 02:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - thoroughly uninformative, and has as much to do with the global currency market as with Mac OS X. David Arthur 02:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - already merged into Mac OS X, also, very different from Windows Vista editions and pricing, in that Windows has lots of editions and sorting out the details is complicated and notable. --- tqbf  04:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. While it's an open debate as to whether pricing belongs in the encyclopedia (I think it should, for the same reason that "system requirements" should be listed; it's a notable characteristic of what's expected of a potential user), having an entire article for pricing extends beyond what we're here to do. -/- Warren 04:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see the practicality of this article.  Doesn't link to much.  Information could probably be found somewhere else. Madd the sane 11:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.