Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Tonight Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Mac Tonight. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Mac Tonight Party

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am unable to find any significant coverage of "Mac Tonight Party" on Google that would warrant a separate article from the already existing mention of this topic in Mac Tonight. Deauthorized. (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Deauthorized. (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried to find sources including using some Chinese keywords to find local press, and found nothing. South China Morning Post mentioned the campaign got an advertising award but that was just name-checking without content. Lots of plush toys available for sale, cute but not WP:RS.Redirect for all the good reasons given by @Cunard. I don't think the existence on McDonald's website does anything but prove it's not a hoax. Oblivy (talk) 06:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mac Tonight (with the history preserved under the redirect), where the subject is already mentioned, per Deletion policy. Mac Tonight Party is discussed on the website of McDonald's Hong Kong:I did not find significant coverage in independent reliable sources about Mac Tonight Party. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 08:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Not finding significant coverage or evidence of notability, I would agree this should redirect to Mac Tonight. No objection to preserving the edit history. Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 05:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.