Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macau.xmas.2005


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  04:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Macau.xmas.2005
An experimental short film that documents the obstacles and challenges most Macanese endure when developing a career in the creative industry. The article and this AfD document the obstacles that self-promoters face in trying to get articles into Wikipedia. Was speedily deleted once as spam. -- RHaworth 23:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - they also document the obstacles and challenges that we face in trying to keep Wikipedia encyclopaedic. Grutness...wha?  00:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Getting deleted on WP will make them stronger when fighting their way over the obstacles. Pavel Vozenilek 01:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 02:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Missvain 03:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Rever e ndG 04:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everything above!  K yo cat  meow! 06:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above commentary. At this rate, we should be doing one of these for every video on YouTube.  --Dennisthe2 08:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything above. Sr13 09:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Re-incarnation of a spam article. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 10:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Spam, spam, spam, spam....  SkierRMH, 11:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable film, no reason whatsoever why it deserves an articleCoaster Kid 17:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --SonicChao 21:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom †he Bread  22:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not warrant inclusion on Wikipedia. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage by reliable, third-party published sources.  -- Satori Son 05:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.