Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macbook air ad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Macbook Air. Has already been done.  Sandstein  20:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Macbook air ad

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Whilst a mention of the manilla envelope reveal and possibly the advertising campaign might be suitable for inclusion in the main article about the laptop I do not think the advert itself has received the kind of attention from reliable sources that will allow a verifiable article to be more than just a summary of the advert. The advert has been mentioned but as far as I have been able to find only in the context of describing the product itself, not on its own as an entity. Some adverts (such as this one) receive significant critical commentary and discussion from reliable sources in there own right I do not think that this ad/campaign has at this stage. Guest9999 (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Macbook Air — content, given proper sourcing, fits in perfectly with the parent article. MuZemike  ( talk ) 00:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Macbook Air per MuZemike. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Macbook Air the policy for notability states that web content must have been "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself". Bassbonerocks (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge- Good fit for parent article and likely non-notable. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge- Over 2 million hits on youtube, but I remember searching for it also, but only for the song title. Without any citations, I can't tell if this thing meets WP:NOTABILITY but the merge makes a lot of sense. Sentriclecub (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.