Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machinima Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Machinima Island

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable project with no refs or sources; article and related articles appear to be authored by creator. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I found a brief mention of Machinima Island in https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429561. Vexations (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Inter-activa. All the cited content is already there, and both articles are short. The sources in the article, , are very minor and possibly not reliable. ~ Maplestrip/Mable  ( chat ) 11:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Minor art projects, references do not suffice for WP:GNG. Ping me if better refs are added. BEFORE fails to show much, seems very niche. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.