Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machosexual (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Machosexual
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This term completely fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG. This is still the case even after I looked for new sources. This is actually the 4th nomination; it was deleted twice in 2005, and nominated again in 2007 but that time was closed as "no consensus". -Crossroads- (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete- Wikipedia is not a repository of advertising neologisms. Reyk YO! 07:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems to have been some long forgotten fad-word that didn't receive long lasting coverage. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 16:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NEO and GNG per nom Dartslilly (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.