Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzie King Village


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to University_of_Waterloo. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Mackenzie King Village

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable dormitory at a university. The award, which might have seemed a possible basis for notability, is    from the Ontario Masonry Contractors' Association, for "Structural Design Award--Institutional (Universities, hospitals, government buildings, etc)" — one of 15 awards they give each year. I consider it minor, because only province-level, because only one of many such awards each year, and because from a non-notable organization. The few other references are from within the university.  DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to University_of_Waterloo - Google provided two results here (Google News) and here (Google Books, minor mention). William Lyon MacKenzie King is notable but keeping the article solely because of this would not be acceptable, notability is not inherited. SwisterTwister   talk  03:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect Endorse ST argument. Obviously a good building by some standards, not sufficiently so to be WP:N. Most refs speak of it in terms of the University's overall expansion plans, not as an independently notable project, hence better as a section in that article.--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley 18:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 12.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. -- Whpq (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect' as suggested above. Mountain Herb (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.