Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macrium Reflect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Macrium Reflect

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced since created in 2008. Google search just returns a sea of download sites, blog posts, and other unreliable sources. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  11:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  02:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a classic fail of WP:NSOFT: only sources are primary, download sites, and review sites (those are only significant coverage if they are not publishing dozens of similar reviews a day). Tigraan (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.