Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Harriet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Female Furies.  Sandstein  07:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Mad Harriet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Coverage seems limited to plot summaries and passing mentions on junk listicles from what I can see. The two non-primary sources in the article contain nothing relevant. TTN (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * delete unless better sources are found. The two non-primary sources appear to be just a plot summaries in DC-licenced fan-encyclopedias (so probably should be classified as dependent sources anyway). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no sources to make it as qualify for GNG. RockOften (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with the membership section of the Female Furies. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Female Furies. Unfortunately I'm not seeing sources to pass GNG, but there is a natural redirect target the character is associated with so that is a better option than deletion. Rhino131 (talk) 19:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 07:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Female Furies per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Haleth (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Female Furies - It should certainly not be kept, and merging would not be needed as there is no content from reliable, secondary sources to merge. The character is already covered on the target article, so a simple Redirect would suffice.  Rorshacma (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.