Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madagascar–Pakistan relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Madagascar–Pakistan relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unreferenced and little information. fails WP:GNG. created by an editor who has gone on a recent spree of creating unreferenced bilaterals. LibStar (talk) 03:27, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only possible justification for a bilateral article is that the relationship is in itself notable, which this one certainly is not. Indeed, if the uncited WP:OR were to be removed, there'd be nothing left. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that this relationship is really notable, and at the moment there is definitely nothing in this article worth keeping. "Both the countries share the same Indian Ocean" is not a credible notability claim. Moswento talky 10:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Fails WP:GNG, a google search does not lead to any reliable sources. -- Fauzan  ✆ talk   ✉ email  14:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete They probably do have relations, but creating an unref'd stub should equate to a speedy deletion in my book. No problem if it's recreated with references to show that it is indeed notable of inclusion.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 17:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * comment this was a declined speedy. Hence we are at AfD. LibStar (talk) 04:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.