Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madagascar 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   15:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Madagascar 3
Pure crystal-ballism. No sources (and I can't find any), and it looks like pure and hopeful speculation. From the creator of Ice Age 3 and Shrek 4 (the articles, not the films). Whoops, I was wrong. Calton | Talk 05:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * There's a Madagascar 2?? (*follows wikilink*) Which is in the very early production stages and won't be released until late 2008! Madagascar 2 is just past the borderline of not being crystalballism. What is this? -- saberwyn 06:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * See for a taste. I just tagged the most obvious violaters of the "No crystal ball" rule. Someone else can decide if Shrek the Third and  Madagascar 2 ought to be nominated. --Calton | Talk 06:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Shrek The Thrid is verifiable. I'll a little iffy on Madagascar 2 though, but wouldn't comment either way if it was nominated. -- saberwyn 07:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 07:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per cyrstal ballism. This can be recreated of more information comes to light. Ydam 11:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The crystal ballism is pretty amazing, considering the second movie won't come out for two years. That means that even if this movie is made, it won't come out for, what, 5 years? -- Kicking222 14:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. --Guinnog 17:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, eek. --Fbv65 e del / &#9745;t / &#9755;c || 18:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Vaniac 01:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per crystal ballism. Voice of Treason 15:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per cyrstal ballism. --Caldorwards4 19:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it might be worthwhile to have an express criterion for future movies (greenlit, actually in production, or whaterever) but this fails any concievable limit. Eluchil404 02:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. By the time this is made, I'll have an article. ;-) Grand  master  ka  06:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.