Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madame Blueberry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 01:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Madame Blueberry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a Veggietales episode, released 15 years ago, that is pretty much non-notable like most of the other Veggietales shorts. All this article is is just an overly detailed plot summary, and a list of segments and songs in the episode. Thats it. There is nothing else in this article that shows this is a notable topic to be included on an encyclopedia like Wikipedia, and I wasn't able to find such thing. I'm also considering nominating the other episode articles for deletion, but I'll see after this review on what I will do with them. But as of now, this fails WP:NF. Editor E  at ma talk page up, scotty! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 20:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: Actually, the majority of them are notable. More Movie-Based Illustrations for Preaching and Teaching, Religion, Politics, Media in the Broadband Era, The New York Times Guide to the Best Children's Videos, Jesus Made in America, Quaker Life, and The Dove Foundation. SL93 (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, Macon Telegraph, and Daily Herald. SL93 (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 12:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as a notable topic per 's listed sources. It helps to search with Google Books to find these kinds of references. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - A single VeggieTales episode isn't a notable topic. However, if there are indeed other articles with information about VeggieTales episodes, I recommend keeping those articles and adding a category, since there are about ten thousand articles out there about television show episodes, and only a handful have been deleted. I am Quibilia. (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - And I refuse to see Doctor Who confined to a single article. I am Quibilia. (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It is a notable topic if it passes WP:NF. Otherwise, it would just be your personal opinion. Technically, it isn't an episode. They were first released straight to video. SL93 (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Following EditorE's logic, a majority of all movie/television show pages would deleted. There is a page of just about every single video (which thus makes every page "notable") and although some (most?) are missing sufficient citations and tend to attract IP editors who are constantly adding in OR nonsense and trivial detail, this is hardly grounds for deletion and the page's failure to completely meet WP:NF appears to be simply his opinion - "sufficient" citations is only one part of Notability. Ckruschke (talk) 19:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Ckruschke
 * Comment: I have removed this AfD from the Television category. This is not a television episode. SL93 (talk) 00:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It did appear on television after initial distribution, so that part isn't completely inappropriate. It should also probably be listed on DELSORT christianity. Jclemens (talk) 01:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Part of my childhood was VeggieTales and I didn't know that. Interesting. SL93 (talk) 02:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I listed it at delsort Christianity earlier. SL93 (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Multiple independent RS'es exist and are documented in this AfD sufficient to show that WP:GNG is met. Jclemens (talk) 01:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.