Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madan Gowri (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Madan Gowri
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG. minor role only in one movie fails WP:NACTOR. DMySon (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, the subject is mostly a youtuber with 5 million subscribers known widely in one state of Tamil Nadu, India and there is a lot of news sources in Tamil language about him. He is certainly notable from the Tamil sources. I could find three sources with WP:SIGCOV in English.  SUN EYE 1  13:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale by I spoke to my teacher  about how vague WP:ENT is, I would want a system where if xyz has so so amount of followers they have a cult following and are notable, just saying “possesses a cult following” is nebulous and counter productive. Celestina007 (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The Hindustan times and Deccan article - even though are reliable sources, can't be counted as independent since they mostly contain content that is being said by the subject and are not discussing him beyond an opening introduction. If we were to be liberal, we would have considered these for WP:BASIC. According to me, The News Minute source still has some value (though I have always doubted the reliability of it). At the current moment, where it stands, it doesn't have enough for WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Might become notable in future. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR pretty easily. The sources aren't really true independent, more interview than article - I'm just not seeing enough for WP:GNG.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.