Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madars Razma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Madars Razma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not sure about this. We do not have articles for many of the World Dart Federation world masters #1 players, and this guy is pretty good, but is only ranking in the 30s to 40s in the world masters. There is scattered enough coverage to build a small article, the question is whether we should. Gigs (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Has never made it even to the round of 32 in any world championship event (regardless of tour) and has career earnings of under 4000 euros. Not a notable professional.204.126.132.231 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep by reading WP:NSPORTS I can see the player is usually notable if he ever competed in highest professional tournaments. I suppose that being qualified even if not succeed to the round of 32 counts as competing. Also, he hold rank no. 1 professional darts player in Latvia of 2010 and 2012, and that also counts as notable. There is no arguments according to policy to delete the article.  Alex discussion ★ 08:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.