Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddie Fitzpatrick (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody. J04n(talk page) 00:03, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Maddie Fitzpatrick
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While this article is fascinating its subject is not a very notable character. Furthermore its only source violates WP:WPNOTRS. Wlmg (talk) 01:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment A merge or redirect to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody or Ashley Tisdale would be more sensible than deletion: regular character in the former, important role for the latter. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. This seems appropriate, a short paragraph in the show article while the expanded description is broken out into a character article.  Gamaliel (talk) 23:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody without prejudice to future re-creation. The subject is a major character on the show, but this article consists almost entirely of trivia with only one source cited and that being an episode of the show. No secondary sources have been provided at all. The article is unsatisfactory as it stands from the point of view of Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the show's main article. There's no need for this one character to have their own article, when the main article is doing a fine job. Ducknish (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep the other main characters get their own page, so why not her? I have undone the edit of the person who redirected the article, because I do not think this discussion is over. Arilicious (talk) 22:50, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.