Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddox Jolie-Pitt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to Angelina Jolie. –  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 20:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Maddox Jolie-Pitt
Non-notable bio.--Fallout boy 09:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Angelina Jolie. Lbbzman 21:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per - pm_shef 22:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Being the offspring of famous parents is no basis by itself.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * An external link to a BBC News article about the article's subject is an assertion of importance or significance. No vote at the moment, besides that it is not eligible for speedy. Samaritan 23:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and/or redirect to Angelina Jolie. Consensus at WP:BIO is that non-notable relatives of notable people go in the notable person's article. Stifle (talk) 00:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mama as per Brooklyn Beckham. MLA 09:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to either Angelina Jolie per MLA or to List of children used primarily as fashion accessories.  young  american  (talk) 19:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Angelina Jolie as per Stiffle MikeMorley 19:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment where are all the redirect advocates when nn "royal babies" articles are AfD-ed? I guess the blue blood keeps us down. Carlossuarez46 20:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Angelina Jolie as per mentioned WP:BIO consensus. Brooklyn Beckham is no longer a redirect, though. -Fadookie Talk 10:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Angelina Jolie per Stiffle (although I do like the "List of children used primarily as fashion accessories" idea). (Hm, isn't the other parent someone famous also?) (Don't delete entirely, as I myself once looked up this entry; a redirect to either parent would have been fine though.) -- Orbst 20:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.