Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Made In The Shade Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Made In The Shade Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article does not show real notability. They only have self published sources. The others that have been deleted make no reference to label. Reb1981 (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU  (T/C) 21:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU  (T/C) 21:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- WP:TOOSOON & A7 material; under two years old. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. Maybe a TOOSOON. South Nashua (talk) 14:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - The best I can find in terms of coverage is this interview; subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG.  gongshow  talk  03:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - not Notable. M assiveYR   ♠  00:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.