Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Made in France


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 16:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Made in France

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a dictionary. So obvious no need for an article Legacypac (talk) 07:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please bundle your closely-related AfD nominations in the future. It completely blows the log page up and wastes everyone's time who either wants to comment on the lot or has to close the conversations. Your 15ish nominations here could have been two.  07:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, . Sure more can be found.  JT dale Talk ~ 07:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Working on that already for the pageant winners, twinkle does not bundle, and directly bundling does not add the deletion template to the pages or notify the creators. The three Made In articles should be considered separately. I found one, then found more via a template, but there are some legit ones like Made in the USA so these should be considered on their own merits. Legacypac (talk) 07:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete This could be a notable topic but nothing in this article provides supporting evidence of that. There are minimal standards for an article to exist and this article does not meet them. There is almost no content here and nothing which stands alone to make an article.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  23:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep: per WP:ASZ. It's a notable topic with plenty of coverage, that it's a stub isn't a reason for deletion. Vrac (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 05:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment - An interesting twist on If a tree falls, as there are obvious sources out there (NPR) to support an article, but someone has to actually step up and write it. Tarc (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.