Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Marie Slavick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Passes WP:NAUTHOR. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  07:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Madeleine Marie Slavick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient evidence from reliable sources of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:45, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Comment Not a great deal of coverage outside of local and self published sources. However, She has won recognised awards at Bumbershoot and the Gourmand World Cookbook Award, but I'm not sure that is sufficient for the "significant critical attention" required by WP:NAUTHOR. Philg88 ♦talk 04:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, notable poet with critical reviews of her poetry in reliable sources, independent sources sufficient to meet WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Moving to keep following addition of new sources sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG/WP:NAUTHOR. Philg88 ♦talk 04:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.