Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Peters (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Madeleine Peters
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NACTOR, and the redirect to Martha Speaks keeps getting reverted (last AfD ended with a redirect to the show). I'd suggest either outright deletion or a delete-and-redirect to Martha Speaks or My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. Probably WP:TOOSOON for this one. KidAd   talk  22:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable actress. Even though she has multiple other Wikipedia entries (on "minor" WPs such as Winaray (Philippines), Ban-lam-gu (Chinese), etc.), those articles are just one sentence, basically containing "Madeleine Peters is a Canadian actress." That's it. And they contain no sources whatsoever. At least the English article contains some sources - even though they are just a database and an interview. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the sourcing is not even remotely close to passing GNG. Interviews do not add towards passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.