Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine schlumberger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep because withdrawn by nom. Bongo matic  02:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Madeleine schlumberger

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Good faith news archive search (probably not exhaustive, but did generate non-English hits) failed to identify any significant coverage in any sources (let alone reliable ones). Bongo matic  14:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems pretty notable. She wrote some notable books and some of her artwork is in notable museums like the Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris. See here and . Google books has two of the books she wrote available. . There is also an article at the French wikipedia  and the German wikipedia .Nrswanson (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see how any of this satisfies WP:CREATIVE, but if you can connect the dots for me, I'd be happy to withdraw the nom. Bongo  matic  01:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In this case the artists work is "represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums" to satisfy WP:Creative. The French wikipedia article seems to indicate she is an important author as well, although probably moreso in France than outside it.Nrswanson (talk) 01:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.