Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeline Amy Sweeney (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 06:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Madeline Amy Sweeney
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is covered by reliable sources in the context of only one event. Although 9/11 was a significant event itself, Sweeney played only a minor role in it. Hirolovesswords (talk) 14:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:iE; mirror rationale as that applied to Kevin Heatley immediately below. One rarely derives genuine notability from victimhood or death, no matter how tragic. I thought these sort of 9/11 cases had all been taken care of by now. Quis separabit?  14:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep As noted in the first AfD a year ago, the subject passes GNG easily. What has changed that requires reconsideration of the first AfD discussion?  Acroterion   (talk)   14:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Fails GNG, IMO. Frankly, without meaning to speak in any way less than respectfully of the dead, her (Sweeney)'s actions simply do not rise to the same level as those of such passengers as Tom Burnett, Mark Bingham, Todd Beamer or Jeremy Glick. Quis separabit?  15:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as IMHO passes GNG. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  17:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think her part of his have generated enough press to count. Besides, the previous afd discussion resulted in a keep decision. Has something changed since then? Bali88 (talk) 00:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - is this nomination for real?. Passes basic WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.