Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madereros de Durango


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" side is weakly argued: they cite no sources that could contribute to notability.  Sandstein  06:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Madereros de Durango

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD. I had initially tagged the page for being unsourced and failing notability guidelines. The tag was removed, and some sources were added, but all primary sources which do not address the notability of the team in question. fuzzy510 (talk) 14:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Mexico. fuzzy510 (talk) 14:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Please consider the new sources added to the article since this AFD was opened. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - Nom may well turn out to be right about notability, but no sign of any BEFORE. I added the sources, such as they are (mostly not primary), from the Spanish article: "unsourced" =/= "inadequately sourced", and it's not inconceivable that a more thorough search would produce more. I've no view one way or the other beyond that. Ingratis (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Added some sources. JTtheOG (talk) 03:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Leaning keep, professional team in a professional league that has received at least some coverage. BD2412  T 06:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Local media routine coverage of match fixtures, no evidence of notability as per WP:GNG. Team is defunct and so is the league, which itself doesn't appear to have been especially notable. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.