Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhu Verma (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Madhu Verma (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

He doesn't meet the rules from WP:NPOL because he hasn't worked at the state or provincial level in government. Also, he hasn't won an election for the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly election yet because it is scheduled to be held on 17 November 2023. This page is only appropriate if he wins that election. Charlie (talk) 03:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Charlie (talk) 03:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Seems to fail WP:NPOL to me and it looks like the article may have been created because they're running for office again. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 19:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * He had hold the executive positions of chairman and director in Indore Development Authority. He was also in the advisory committee of Narmada Valley Devlopment Authority. Jatin S. Sharma (talk) 08:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as of now fails WP:NPOL.-Admantine123 (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep fails WP:NPOL, but may meet WP:GNG, at least these 2 articles are good 1 and 2. Upper Deck Guy (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It takes a lot more than just two hits of run of the mill campaign coverage to make an unelected candidate "notable because GNG" in lieu of having to win an NPOL-passing office. Bearcat (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Candidates don't get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, but nothing else here constitutes a valid claim of preexisting notability for other reasons independently of a candidacy. Obviously no prejudice against recreation next month if he wins, but nothing here is already enough as of now. Bearcat (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.