Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhumita datta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Madhumita datta


Article only weakly asserts notability, and "Madhumita Datta journalist" gets only 23Ghits. Clearly non-notable. Also vanity, judging by username of the SPA who created the article. Moreschi 18:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete appears non-notable. Kavadi carrier 19:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It isn't notable. Hello32020 20:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. Xdenizen 20:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   -- Mereda 10:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The book (plus documentary film and TV work) might make the grade if properly cited. But most of my search hits seem to be about a different person - the environmental activist Madhumitta Dutta (on Bhopal and ship-breaking pollution issues). --Mereda 10:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Madhumitadatta and Delete. utcursch | talk 13:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Madhumitadatta and Delete per Utcursch   Doctor Bruno    17:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete pending assertion of notability. I've read the Aajkal newspaper in the past and to assert that someone is the "chief reporter" without a byline is unsubstantiated. Also mentioning the names of the television programs would be useful as would the publisher of her book, since a book may be self-published with a print order of 100 copies.Antorjal
 * Weak delete- More references are needed to convince her notability. Is there any Bengali wikipedians to comment on this topic..? I got this link from google.But her notability is still in question...!. Nileena joseph (Talk 19:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.