Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhupur Sonbhadra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:37, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Madhupur Sonbhadra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promo and content fork of Sonbhadra district The Banner talk 10:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. We don't consider settlements to be content forks and this village is verifiable. A move to Madhupur, Sonbhadra may be in order. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Then you can still see it as copy and paste. And promo. The Banner talk 17:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * A merge is also possible. Bearian (talk) 17:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)



 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep - The article is in poor shape, but I don't see that is promotional, and as a village, a separate article is appropriate. I agree with Gene93k that moving it to the standard title makes sense. --- Whpq (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: I removed the one sentence about cave paintings. Perhaps this is what the nom thought to be promotional. I agree, it is definitely unsourced and poorly written, but we hold inhabited places to be notable, so in the absence of red flags this is a clear keep. A move per Gene93k makes good sense. BethNaught (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.