Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhurima


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. there seems agreement that the article as rewritten about the current subject is acceptable.  DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Madhurima

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable TV anchor from India. Hahc21 [ TALK ] [ CONTRIBS  ] 21:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  00:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)



DELETE - Not notable enough to be on wikipedia and does not meet any notability guidelines on wiki. No external/ third party/ reliable links provided by the creator of the article. Anyone can upload videos on youtube. So DELETE.--Bharathiya 09:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment. There is a far better known actress named Madhurima than this TV anchor. Most Google results lead to that actress, hence I have reworked the article and added couple of sources. Johannes003 (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Johannes003, did you change the content of the whole article to this other Madhurima that you are mentioning? That means basically deleting the old article and thus making this AfD redundant? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Exactly, that virtually means the earlier article has been deleted and replaced by a new one about another person. Johannes003 (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep (new version of the article) Editor 2050 (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * KEEP - New version of the article. Bharathiya 02:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC) (talk)
 * Comment You've !voted Delete and Keep in the same AfD. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: True. please check with the history of the page. Earlier there was no reference at all. Please Note that user:Johannes003 has changed the whole article and virtually the old article has already been deleted and another article is in place!!!. The old article was recommended for deletion since there was no reliable links attached. Meanwhile I agree with User:Animeshkulkarni above.- Bharathiya 08:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC) (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.