Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Minotaurs Rugby Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Madison Minotaurs Rugby Club

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no notability for this rugby team. Fails WP:N. The team has also never played in a professional league. SL93 (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * weak keep Division 3 team, has received some coverage. (radio interview)  Gaijin42 (talk) 19:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Gaijin42. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of meeting WP:RU/N. Purely local coverage in the links provided above and google not finding anything more significant. Amateur club in a low division of a state league. noq (talk) 11:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, noq. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 20:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - It isn't only part of a low division of a state league. It's a member of what seems to be the largest gay rugby association in the world. In spite of this, the coverage seems so local, and there's so little of it, that I had to come to the conclusion that the club was not notable enough for its own article. T  C  N7 JM  12:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into Wisconsin Rugby Football Union after removing the encyclopaedic content. Not notable enough for stand alone article as per TCN7JM. – Shudde  talk 11:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per, , and . Technical 13 (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.